Skip to main content

blog 1.6: What the Constitution says Berkeley can do when controversial speakers come knocking

1. Lawyers can from Berkeley can navigate through the constitutional maze faster and more accurately.
2."Sure, in principle. But we have to think about some things before we can sign off to this."
3.The organizers approach all situations as "content neutral" so Black Lives Matter and Richard Spencer are treated the same.
4. Groups might not think the alternate location is good enough, but judges decide what is "good enough".
5. Groups must pay for security which includes police overtime pay.
6. Most students of the First Amendment think that the city or university has to cover the costs.
7. You can not incite imminent lawless action.
8. Crowds can shut down a speaker because supporters are no different from jeerers attending the event.
9. Police must protect the violence directed at them. The police must target lawbreakers, but they can shut down a speaker or event to stop violence.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Blog 1: Why the ACLU defends white nationalists' right to protest - including in Charlottesville

1. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) advocates for the freedom of speech for everyone regardless of the "unsavory" topic. The ACLU believes that the First Amendment right to free speech must be a universal right. Although, the ACLU may not agree with the group and topic at hand; nonetheless, it supports their right to exercise freedom of speech. They argue that standing up for free speech in ALL cases is the necessary work for civil rights. Civil rights without the freedom of speech would be shut down completely by those in power. 2. The city of Charlottesville originally tried to revoke the protest permit of the rally organizers, Jason Kessler, and this presents a problem to the ACLU. The ACLU joined the defense team of Kessler arguing that this infringes on his right to free speech. 3.Liberals have supported the ACLU more this year since Trump took office because they vowed to hold the administration accountable in court. 4. The ACLU argues that the government mi...
Post a Comment
Read more

blog 2.5 Lisa Murkowski

1. (R-AK) Murkowski and Susan Collins (R-ME) 2.  She told Roll Call she would consider voting for the bill if the Senate also passed a bipartisan Obamacare stabilization bill — then walked it back a few hours later. A few days later, she wrote an op-ed for a local newspaper declaring she supported repealing the individual mandate. But then her office said the same day that did not necessarily mean she would support the tax overhaul. 3.a provision that could allow oil drilling in the Arctic Wildlife Natural Refuge. 4. It has been a long-held dream of Alaska politicians for the revenue it would bring to the state. 5.Alaska, one of the states that did expand Medicaid under Obamacare, has seen its uninsured rate fall from 18.9 percent to 11.7 percent under the health care law. While Murkowski is still a Republican, and therefore still has problems with the law, she didn’t want to see those gains reversed. The Republican plans were projected to hit her state, which already has the h...
Post a Comment
Read more

blog 2.6 Lobbying and tax reform

1.One part of the bill could cost the conglomerate more than $1 billion in new taxes if it becomes law. 2.GE lobbyists scrambled and won an alternative in the Senate’s version of the tax bill preserving the company’s ability to use those losses when calculating its tax liability 3.Foreign airlines including Emirates Airline of Dubai and Etihad Airways of Abu Dhabi are fighting to jettison a provision included in the Senate bill that would require foreign airlines to pay taxes on income earned on U.S. flights in some cases. Delta Air Lines Inc. is lobbying to keep the new tax in the final bill, arguing that it could raise $200 million over a decade. 5. Its centerpiece is a reduction in the corporate tax rate to 20% from 35%. It would also repeal the alternative minimum tax, lower estate taxes and cut some individual rates. It is estimated to cost about $1.4 trillion over the next decade. Republicans say some of the revenue loss would be recouped by higher government receipts fro...
Post a Comment
Read more